2013 Panini Black Preivew is Not Living Up to It’s Potential So Far

Aside from the fact that it remains a BLATANT rip off of Upper Deck’s tremendous original set from 2009, I think there was some definite potential to have a nice rebound year in 2013 from Panini’s version of Black. As I mentioned before, I thought 2012 Black was a terrible excuse for a high end product, with poorly designed cards and little to no on card content. For this year, it looks like many of the designs were improved significantly, but the on card content is still yet to be determined.

Panini posted a QC preview on their site, and now that we are seeing some of the finished product, I have some thoughts.

Rookie Patch Autos

Last year’s RPAs were the best designed cards in the set, but as per usual Panini, thick paint pens were used to sign them. Not only did this not turn out well for a lot of the signature quality, but it also made the cards significantly more ugly. Topps struggled with this in 2012 Inception as well, losing signature quality in favor of more quick drying pens. Topps had had MASSIVE success in a banner year for 2011 Inception, and the Black autos would have been awesome with the thin pens. This year, they switched to blue, offering a ghosted out white space for the rookies to sign. The cards look A LOT better, and I might chase a few of them.

Last year:

2012 Panini Black Nick Foles Auto Patch /349

2012 Panini Black Russell Wilson Auto Patch /99

This year:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-60panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-56panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-54panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-52panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-44panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-42

Rookie Base Autos

This is where 2012 Black really missed the mark in every way, shape and form. Because Panini wasn’t smart enough to design the cards with a background light enough to show the stickers they wanted to use, they opted for the BIG SILVER BOX! It not only looked horrendous, but only served to make an ugly design more unappealing. This year, that has changed, and the cards are vastly improved. I thought most of these would be on card, but Panini really let us down with ANOTHER batch of stickers. Some of them look to be on card, but most look to be stickers.

Last Year:

2012 Panini Black Josh Gordon RC Auto

2012 Panini Black Kirk Cousins RC Auto

This Year:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-89panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-79panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-70

Veteran and Retired Autos

As I mentioned above, the 2012 vet autos were PLAGUED by the big silver box that someone decided looked good enough to ship. This is where I am a bit confused, as I thought the vet autos were going to be on card. I guess that might only be the case for some of them, which only cheapens this high end product more than it already is. At least they look pretty good without that stupid box.

Last Year:

2012 Panini Black Jordy Nelson Auto Marks of Distinction

2012 Panini Black Ryan Fitzpatrick Auto Jersey

This Year:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-80panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-75

Rookie Jersey Showcases

I don’t know if you can technically call these shadowboxes, but that is definitely the effect they were going for here. I absolutely hate the idea for these cards, even if they were executed perfectly. No player pictures on a card always piss me off, and this just takes it to the extreme. Instead of giving us mini jerseys encased in a card and then signed, or something of that design, we get this shit. Its literally a picture of a jersey casually laid out on a table, and then covered with signed acetate. Yes, Panini couldnt even be bothered to stretch the jersey appropriately for the shoot, instead opting to do it in a lackadaisical fashion. Well, it shows. I cant understand why anyone would want these.

Here are what REAL shadowboxes should look like:

2013 Topps Strata Keenan Allen Auto Relic Shadowbox

2013 SP Authentic Barry Sanders Shadowbox Art Card

Here are these atrocities:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-36panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-38panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-35

Metal Rookies and Vets

I think these cards might be the coolest of the previews, only because Im not really sure how to describe them. If they have signed versions of these, Im in. They look pretty cool.

Here are some of the metal cards Topps did for Sterling Baseball:

Bowman Sterling Byron Buxton Metal Auto

Here they are:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-138panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-136panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-132panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-131

Here are some of the other cards from the preview as well. Many of them I wouldnt buy with someone else’s money:

panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-1111panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-4panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-5panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-126panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-122panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-108panini-america-2013-black-football-qc-120

Although I am sure there is more to this set that we haven’t seen, so far I am very much on the fence. If we see that there are some veteran sigs, on card, and a lot of nice looking stuff without significant amounts of redemptions, ill have a different assessment. It seems as though that wont be the case, however. Unfortunate, as usual.

2 thoughts on “2013 Panini Black Preivew is Not Living Up to It’s Potential So Far

  1. Where are the game shots for the rookies??? I’m tired of seeing photos from the Premiere. The season is over. The card companies need to figure it out. Adam, do you know the process for getting game shots? Is it difficult for the companies or are they just lazy?

  2. They say timing and production deadlines, but cost of obtaining the photos is probably the main concern.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>