Ruminations on Hobby Life: Part III

A few weeks ago, I posted my first two volumes of Ruminations on Hobby Life, an exercise in observation that was pretty fun for me. It took me a while to get some other ideas of what to do, so this has been a long time in the works. For those of you unfamiliar, I took this idea from a funny site (Ruminations.com) where people post their observations on daily life. Although mine are far from that quality, it’s a good time putting this together each time I do it. Enjoy.

– Cool card idea: Anyone ever see the signed photos that Mounted Memories has with the black and white picture and color player? Most of the time, those photos look great. For something so simple, it would make a pretty sweet on card auto subset. No stupid busy design, just a white bordered black and white photo with a color player pic and a hard signed signature. It would be amazing. I would collect the set.

– Why are so many people’s perception of a product’s “cool factor” related to whether or not they got a good card out of the boxes they broke? Some guy emailed me saying that he thought Classics was the best ever Panini set because he pulled a Tebow /25, and that I was stupid for calling it crap. Umm, no.

– Speaking of haters, I don’t comprehend when people bring up the concept that any criticism is a direct result of jealousy. I saw it on a message board for another hobby of mine. Can someone explain that to me? I really do not understand why someone could think that envy has anything to do with any of the things I bash on this site. Desiring a certain aspect of improvement seems to be a completely different emotion than being jealous.

– Why was Mark Sanchez the crown jewel of the 2009 rookie class? True the Jets were in the AFC Championship game, but Sanchez was not the reason they were there. Can someone find me a QB that threw 20 INTs on their way to playoff success at any point in history? That is crazy.

– In a similar vein, Sam Bradford may challenge that stat line this year from the looks of things.

– Another cool card idea: Muddy and Bloody Memorabilia autographs. I think that in most cases jersey pieces that are dirty rarely make it into sets. How about a set dedicated to dirty game used swatches. I think that would be pretty cool. Even better if there was an inscription from the player.

– I really hate when I see a player pictured in one uniform, and the jersey is from another team. It deflates the joy of the card. Upper Deck was infamous for doing this, and sometimes its unavoidable, but its annoying. I just saw a 1/1 Brett Favre auto pulled on Blowout with Nike swooshes. Reebok has made the NFL jerseys for years.

– I wonder if Topps ever considered doing a set with just cards from previous iconic sets. No reprints, all buybacks. Get some rookie autos in there to appease the leagues, and make everything else valuable cards that people recognize. It would have to be expensive, but I think it would be interesting to see if it turned out.

– Is there a reason to name subsets anymore? When you call a subset something completely lame like “Freshman Orientation” or “Material Monikers” it takes away from the overall appeal of the card to me. I don’t think people would be that angry if they pulled a Donruss Elite Auto Jersey instead of a “Down and Distance” auto jersey.

– I think a good way to keep things fresh would be forcing the card companies to redo their product calendar every year. Give them three slots for their marquee sets, and the rest have to be completely new concepts.

– Cards that need to go: Panini signed manupatches, Topps booklets, signed manuletters, and single jersey cards. None of these bring something positive to the table.

– Topps said they use the stickers they do because they have a backlog, and yet we new stickers used every year. The leagues should force the companies to depleat their stock and start introducing hard signed cards. If a company like Upper Deck can put out a calendar with 8+ products that feature on card signatures, the other companies can do it too. Its not a bad thing to use half stickers and half on card autos until the stickers are gone.

– Speaking of stickers, I don’t get why the companies don’t pay us back a little for using them. It would be cool to get more inscriptions on the stickers, or at least something to make it worth more.

– Does anyone start to wonder what would happen if we actually got an all access look into the manufacturers? I think I would probably stop collecting due to disgust.

– Who chooses the pictures used on the cards? I have to believe it’s the design team. I don’t get why every card doesn’t have the best possible pictures. That new Strasburg chrome auto has the most ridiculous picture ever, and that will no doubt detract from the value. Topps had to know that.

– Is anyone else as happy as I am that the amount of products featuring celebrities in sports cards has dropped? I remember when every set had some celebrity element back in 2008. Upper Deck was a prime offender, and maybe the card gods got pissed at them.

– I don’t think redemptions are always the fault of the companies, but the replacements fall 100% on their shoulders. What if we were able to choose from a list of replacements instead of being surprised? That way you actually get something you want. Each card is assigned a tier, and those tiers are updated with market trends. The higher the tier, the higher the replacement. Lower tier cards can be added together to replace a higher tier one. That would be a cool system.

– If 10-15% of a product run is always held back for QC problem replacements, what happens to the left overs? There arent THAT many redemptions that go unfufilled.

– Topps should make a coffee table book of their historic sets. Kramer would appreciate it.

– Lastly, someone should create a hot or not website for cards. Each time a product is released, the gallery should be posted an people should be able to vote on whether or not the cards look good. I think that it would be interesting to see how it turns out. Guaranteed, Triple Threads would get the opposite reaction I want it to.

That’s it for now, let me know if you guys have any items brewing in your brains that you want me to post. It takes a while for me to compile my thoughts into one of these posts, so hopefully I will have more to share at a future date.

Ruminations on Hobby Life: Part II

Last week I published a series of what I called Ruminations on Hobby Life. It was a card collecting version of a popular website where people talked about the random thoughts that popped into their heads. This is a similar venture into my mind, with the goal of preventing these nuggets of info and ideas from continuing to drill into my cortex.

Here are a few more:

– Watching people try to defend their use of book value over recent eBay sales is like watching a baby try to walk before its able. They just try to stand and take steps, but ultimately just fall on their butts. Sometimes you even get a nice good cry out of them when they do.

– I know eBay keeps past auctions sales SOMEWHERE. How hard would it be to allow people to view all of them? Im actually curious. That’s a lot of info, but I would expect it to be VERY beneficial to those who know how to use it.

– Have you ever seen a past card you owned come up for sale again? To me, its kind of trippy. I always watch those items just to get a portion of that feeling I had back when I owned it. I would guess it feels something like seeing an old friend from high school that you never really talked to.

– If a card company came up to you and offered to make a card of you, only one copy, would you take it? Im not sure I would. I mean, if I had a card made of me, I would want it to get into the hands of as many people as possible. Plus, if I had the only copy, that kind of defeats the purpose, doesn’t it? I would even sign 10,000 cards for free if it meant more people would pull them. I don’t want the fame, I just want there to be enough of them that all my haters could gather and do a card burning. That would be well worth it.

– Cool card idea: Dual autograph featuring big hits in Hockey or football. May be tough to get the guy who got destroyed on board, but the hitter would definitely be proud. I would. You know, like get a picture of one of those hits over the boards in hockey, one where you can just see the guy’s feet or something. Get it signed by both guys. Even that one where the punter got blowed up on that kick return a few years ago. I would collect that set.

– I think it actually takes MORE effort to write a poorly spelled and gimmicky box break post on a message board than just a normal one. Yet, people still do it.

– If I were working for a card company, I would scour the fan favorites for players that only had one or two autos, and then create one of the coolest cards around. I bet it would sell for a lot. There has to be one or two of those players that exist. Hell, John Randle just went into the HOF, how many auto patches does he have?

– If a player charges 200 per card, but their auto sells for 150, do you think they know about it? I don’t think so. Maybe someone needs to tell Emmitt Smith that he cant charge what he does because his cards just arent worth that much. Its not like he needs the money right? Why do they even charge what they do? I guess if they did it for charity, it would be different.

– Do you find yourself looking at signatures from non-famous people and evaluating it as a sports autograph? I think athletes go to classes to create their signature. They just LOOK like a famous person’s signature. I know Pat Neshek put a lot of thought into his, but he is crazy nuts. I got a check as a gift from one of my parent’s friends for Noah, and I couldn’t help but think “this would look great as a cut sig!”

– With all the cards that are created each year, you would expect that there was at least one designer that snuck an easter egg into one of them. You know like photoshopping a sign in the crowd to say I love you to their kid or something. THAT would be epic to find.

– Cool card idea: Autograph set where the player inscribes their stats for their career game. You know, that one where they scored 8 TDs and rushed for 572 yards or something like that. Pujols would sure have a hard time with that one though.

– When the companies do autograph sessions with players and they sit there for four hours, I think its in their best interest to take a minute and a half and take some video. Show us what its like. That Tiger Woods video that UD did was awesome, too bad we didn’t get the full cut, where the IHOP waitress popped up from under the table when he was done.

– Another cool card idea: a redemption for every card of a certain player for the brand’s entire card year. Super collectors would go freaking nuts.

– Yet ANOTHER cool card idea: Dual auto card of a young star player and their older favorite player. Im filled with these things. Its terrible.

– Since we are all about vanity, one of the companies should create a collector leaderboard for one of their spokespeople. Collectors enter their individual codes from the backs of that player’s cards, and whoever gets the most points, gets to meet that person at the end of the year. Make autos and auto jerseys worth different amounts, and 1/1s get ridiculous points.

– Last cool card idea: HOF Class auto cards. ‘Nuff said.

– Does anyone have more attachment to cards they have actually pulled? There are a few I have and wont sell because I pulled them. I think its dumb, but I cant let them go. I sold a Nolan Ryan auto that I pulled once, I regret it to this day.

That’s about it for now. If I think of more ruminations, maybe ill be able to create another one of these posts. I will say its fun to have a spot to write down ideas and thoughts like this.

Ruminations on Hobby Life

There are a lot of websites out there that focus on things that they randomly think about randoms stuff. Basically, they just write about observations that they make about daily life, which usually turn out to be pretty funny. There is even a site dedicated to posting these statements, most of which definitely make you think and/or laugh pretty hard. I have been gathering my own observations, catered to the readers of this site. I may start doing this as a regular piece, but Im not sure how hard it will be to continue to collect enough of them to do so.

Anyways, here are my Ruminations on Hobby Life:

– Do you ever not like a player because of the helmet he wears? I mean, I find myself not liking any players that wear those revolution helmets, they just look so weird. Its only perfect that Tim Tebow wears one of the even weirder new ones.

– I wonder if I could get away with fake patches. I know all the ways that they make it obvious, so with that information, could I make undetectable fakes? Not that I would ever do it, but its interesting to know that I am sitting on a knowledge base that could make me tons of money in a bad way.

– How did we ever think that it wasn’t gross to include hair pieces in cards? I get that it’s a big thing among certain memorabilia and americana collectors, but that doesn’t mean it isnt any less disgusting.

– Who came up with having the players sign stickers instead of the cards? Its odd to think that label autos were the solution to getting cards out on time. I would think of many other things before going that direction.

– Why do people still buy products like Topps Rookie Progression or Topps performance? I really want to meet the people who are looking on blowout and say to themselves, “this looks EXACTLY like the product I want.” I get that they are cheap, but its now 2010 and the price is no longer a positive aspect of the purchase.

– Why is it that the people who buy all the sets I despise are pretty much the same type of people in terms of personality? Its like there is a criteria sheet that goes along with buying a box of Triple Threads.

– How come we havent had a set that is all 1/1s? You would think that it’s the natural progression of the high end part of the hobby. We had the Oval Office thing, but I am talking about a licensed set of Football or Baseball cards. I would think people would go nuts.

– Does anyone actually look for rookie card logos on the player cards? Does it really avoid confusion?

– Speaking of confusion, has anyone actually met any single person that is confused by the amount of different cards out there? I hate that argument.

– Upper Deck started from a local card shop in California, and I think that based on today’s cost and licensing, that would be impossible today.

– If eBay had a task force to cut down on fake autos and fake patches, Im pretty sure it would do a lot to improve their image among collectors. Really it would just take three or four people who’s job it is to accept the fraud emails that currently get ignored, and look through new items to impose punishment on people who break the rules. $150,000 investment that would do wonders for them.

– I am debating starting a message board for collectors. However, I wouldn’t stand for any of the crap that goes down on blowout or SCF. That, and if you even put the letters “M”, “O”, and “J” in that special order, you get a lifetime ban. I think it would be cool to have a “hobby illuminati” message board. It would need an application process, no doubt.

– I am curious as to the end goal of set collectors these days. Back in 1960, it was a little different because there were no high end cards. Now, if a card doesn’t have an auto, it is rarely worth anything. So, building a set of the most common cards, doesn’t have the same effect it used to. A sense of accomplishment is a valid discussion on this point, but the cost to get to that end, doesn’t seem worth the time to me.

– I think that contest Upper Deck had in basketball, where you could build your own box of Exquisite was a great idea. Seconded only by the Upper Deck redemption of creating your own 8 signature card in baseball. This needs to be done again, but the boxes should not be able to be sold the way they were. That was crap.

– How cool would it be to be able to create your own card. Not of you, of a player. Pick the patch, pick the photo, help with the design, and place the auto. I think I could create one of the most ridiculous cards if I had that opportunity.

– I think it would be awesome if they did a box topper in a high end product with auto patches that contained the NFL shield, the chest logo, a shoulder number and a jersey letter. Get all those super premium patches onto one card. Triple Turds tried to execute with those terrible tri-fold cards, but Im talking about 8×10 sized cards with all that.

– I wonder how Field of Dreams makes any money. I never see anyone buy anything in their stores, and their prices are so high that I would laugh if someone did. Did they even survive the recession?

– I think more players should do exactly what Brett Favre and Cal Ripken do with their autographs. Sell them through your own site with triple authentication the way Favre does. It would save me a lot of time sorting through fakes on eBay.

– What does a price analyst do at Beckett all day? Considering how off their prices are, I have this vision of them playing solitaire on their computers for 8 hours a day. On a similar note, what makes a “senior” price analyst different from their regular people?

– Does anyone ever wish they had omnipotent knowledge of the things done by the companies? I think if I knew ALL of the bad stuff that happens, I wouldn’t collect anymore. I have a really bad feeling about all the stuff we don’t know, so it wouldn’t be a good idea to have the supreme knowledge.

– Another awesome idea for a card: redemption for an oversized card that features the starting lineup for the super bowl champions. Have a picture of them on the field and have all of them sign it.

– Yet another awesome idea for a card: redemptions for a personalized auto card. I think redemptions for cool things like that are incredibly underused, and wouldn’t be that hard or that expensive to produce. Put in the code on the site, and type in what you want the player to sign.

– Does anyone wonder if the Topps Employee cards from Ginter were the result of some bet at Topps HQ? I don’t know if there is any other explanation for why they were included. I think that would be a great Christmas bonus for them though. “Here is your check, and oh by the way, your autograph will be in Ginter this year.”

– I wonder what players think when they get a box of 10,000 cards to sign. That mailman who brings the box must get some pretty odd looks shot his way.

– I think more card companies should run things by consultants. I think a lot of problems could be fixed if they procured a team of knowledgable people to give input. Hell, I know at least 40 qualified people who would do it for free.

– There is a website that turns your blog into a book. I don’t think mine would transfer very well. I would write a book, but the time and money it would take is not worth it. That, and no one would buy it.

– I sometimes wonder where this site will be in five years. Its eventually going to get to a point where I wont have fun doing it any more. Then what?

– Last but not least, if I could bring back one set from the last 10 years, I have to say it would be 2005 Artifacts Baseball. The only difference would be that the boxes wouldn’t be stuffed with ten million crap autos around the awesomeness from other parts of the set. Its odd how a product with as many good looking cards as it has could have s
uch a terrible set up in boxes. Buying a box of 2005 artifacts was like burning a 100 dollar bill. It was awful with a capital A. Yet, when you hit a good card, you REALLY hit a good card. The Mauer auto patch I have from that is still my favorite Mauer card I own.

Any ruminations from the peanut gallery? Im eager to hear yours.